نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه حقوق، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
There is a variety of opinions in Islamic jurisprudence regarding the conditionality of the predictability of damages in civil liability. While Iranian law contains no explicit provision, Iranian jurists have adopted three approaches: conditionality, non-conditionality, and a distinction between contractual and tortious liability. Egyptian law predominantly maintains the differentiation approach in its legislation, legal doctrine, and judicial practice. This study, employing a descriptive-analytical method, argues that the non-conditionality perspective is more accurate because parties do not consider all contractual consequences, including contractual liability, at the time of contract formation. Contractual liability fundamentally stems from the parties' intent, while the law primarily interprets and validates contractual effects. Principles such as Lā ḍarar (no harm) and respect for established rights necessitate full compensation for damages - whether foreseeable or not - in both contractual and tortious liability. This view not only balances contractual agreements but also ensures economic security in transactions, promotes justice in contractual wealth distribution, and prevents exploitative approaches to contracts for unjust enrichment. It aligns more closely with the objectives of Islamic law and legal science.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)