نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکترای تخصصی حقوق خصوصی، مدرس دانشگاه، گروه حقوق، مرکز آموزش عالی جوادالائمه(ع)، دانشگاه علمی کاربردی، یزد، ایران.
2 استاد، گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
An individual whose actions cause damage to another may act without motive (as in most accidents), with an illegitimate motive such as usurper, or with a legitimate motive. The primary instances of legitimate motive include benevolent intent (Iḥsān), exercising one's right, and legitimate defense. This study examines the effect of legitimate motive on tortious liability and the limitations of invoking it to exempt liability, employing a descriptive-analytical methodology. In Imami jurisprudence and Iranian law, the principle is no-fault liability where motive generally does not affect liability. However, legitimate motive constitutes one of the grounds for exemption from tortious liability. That said, mere benevolent intent or the intention to prevent harm or benefit another is insufficient to exempt liability; the act itself must also be objectively justified. The limitations of legitimate motive include compliance with legal provisions, technical standards, safety principles, and reasonable boundaries. In cases of doubt regarding tortious liability and its removal due to legitimate motivation, tortious liability is applied.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)