نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکترای حقوق خصوصی، مدرس دانشگاه واحد میبد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، میبد، ایران
2 استاد دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران- ریاست انجمن علمی آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
A person whose behavior causes damage to another person may have no motivation as in most accidents. Also, they may either have an illegitimate motivation such as a usurper or may have a legitimate motivation. The most important examples of legitimate motivation are the benefaction motivation, applying one’s right and the legitimate defense. The purpose of the present article is studying the effect of legitimate motivation in tortious liability and its related limitation in resolving the tortious liability using descriptive-analytical method. In Imamiah jurisprudence and Iran laws, there is strict liability principle and motivation has no role in tort, however, legitimate motivation is one of the absolvers of tortious liability. However, mere benevolent motivation and mere containing the damage or give somebody an advantage are not enough to resolve the tortious liability; rather the act must be according to the reality. The limitations of legitimate motivation include observing the law, technical standards, safety principles and common boundaries. If there is doubt in tortious liability and it is absolved due to legitimate motivation, the tortious liability is applied.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)