نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 - استادیار گروه حقوق- دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی- دانشگاه گلستان - گرگان- ایران
2 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Even though there is a serious difference of opinion among the jurists regarding the validity of the pending contract, and the famous jurists have assumed it to be invalid, but the civil law and jurists have not given themselves any doubts about the validity of the pending contract. With this description, it has rarely happened that lawyers are suspended from one party of the contract. The possibility of suspending the contract towards one party in barter contracts requires rights and specifications in the current market, and in practice, it is widely used, especially in credit contracts. It is the analysis of the legal nature of the opinion towards one party of the contract, with the reasons and challenges arising from it, that creates this type of error in the mind, which, among other things, can be converted into these contracts with the requirement of exchange in bart er contracts, being unknown. He pointed out the existence and impossibility of the principle of authenticity in it. which, among other things, can be converted into these contracts with the requirement of exchange in barter contracts, bein g unknown. He pointed out the existence and impossibility of the principle of authenticity in it.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)