نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران؛ استاد دروس خارج فقه و اصول حوزۀ علمیۀ خراسان، مشهد، ایران.
2 دانشیار، گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The use of legal stratagem (Ḥiyal-i sharʿī) in various branches of jurisprudence—such as purity (Ṭahārat), marriage (Nikāḥ), divorce (Ṭalāq), sale (Baiʿ), lease (Ejāreh), and others—as a means to avoid committing sins and to achieve lawful ends while overcoming legal hurdles, has always had both proponents and opponents. Some consider these stratagems prohibited, while others deem them permissible. The question is how a legally responsible person (Mukallaf) can employ an improper act as a means to achieve their objective and have legal effects attached to it. The present study, using a descriptive-analytical method and relying on library sources, examines the most important legal stratagems related to marriage (Nikāḥ) that have not yet been independently, thoroughly, or comprehensively discussed and analyzed. By referencing Quranic verses, traditions (Aḥādīth), and rational judgments, the study concludes that: (1) Declaring apostasy (Irtidād) without inner rejection does not render someone an apostate; (2) Contracting marriage with a suckling infant for the purpose of establishing Mahramiyyat (kinship prohibition) with her mother is not valid; (3) Stipulating the dissolution of the marriage contract after its legalization (Taḥlīl) does not result in the dissolution of the contract; and (4) Regarding the creation of marriage prohibitions for a man in relation to the woman he desires, although this may have legal effects, in some cases its use is forbidden
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)