عنوان مقاله [English]
The nature of Anfal allocation and how to acquire them in jurisprudence and law has a very important role in preserving wealth and public property. The conditions and requirements of the time of absence of the jurists and authorities led them to argue for some reasons to moderate the sovereign nature of Anfal and personalize the acquisition of members of society in the use of Anfal and their fatwas were to acquire Anfal in the time of absence. There is no need for permission from the Islamic government. Continuation of such a process has many drawbacks and regardless of the governmental and civilizational role of jurisprudence in the present time, it has adverse consequences for society and causes the destruction of many wealth and public property and disrupts the social system. This article has tried to analyze the consequences of the ownership of Anfal in the time of absence by examining the evidence of the tendency of jurists and references to the personalization of the Anfal in the era of occultation, and by quoting arguments; Such as the principles of religion, the foundation of reason, the nature of Anfal and the secondary rulings appropriate to the conditions and requirements of the contemporary era; That is, the sovereign ownership of Anfal in the era of absence and the need to obtain permission from the Islamic government along with its principles and arguments.