Examining Primary and Secondary Exceptions to the Decree on Nationalization of Natural Resource Lands

Document Type : scientific

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Natural resource lands, defined as lands with natural vegetation that have remained in their natural state, were nationalized and classified as public property through the Law on Nationalization of Forests on January 17, 1963 (27 Dey 1341). Lands that had been revived prior to the enactment of this law were exempted from this nationalization decree and termed "exceptions." However, disagreement persists regarding the accepted date of revival for natural resource lands, with some authorities, relying on the Guardian Council's theory and advisory opinions, considering the date announced by the government on March 7, 1987 (16 Esfand 1365) as the criterion. Furthermore, secondary exceptions - those exempted from the nationalization decree without direct revival but by virtue of their connection to revived exceptions - are often overlooked in judicial practice and official expert opinions. Jurisprudential and legal studies on these two issues have led to the following findings: the accepted revival date for principal exceptions (including rural houses and facilities, agricultural lands, and orchards) is March 7, 1987 (16 Esfand 1365); and secondary exceptions also possess jurisprudential and legal foundation and should be considered alongside principal exceptions. Secondary exceptions fall into two categories: intermediate lands and peripheral lands (protective perimeter). This means that the revival of one portion of a land parcel necessitates the revival of another portion. Additionally, peripheral lands and protective perimeters required for revived lands - such as courtyards in cases of individual ownership and village pastures in cases of collective ownership - are placed at the disposal of the owner(s) following the revival of the main land. Finally, the easement rights of those who revived national natural resource lands remain valid.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Amoli, Mohammad Taqi. (2005). Misbah al-Huda fi Sharh al-‘Urwah al-Wuthqa (Vol. 11). Tehran: Mu’allif. [In Arabic]
  2. Asghari, ‘Abd al-Reza. (2012). Barrasi-ye Feqhi-ye Hoquqi-ye Marate‘ va Jangal-ha-ye Vaqe‘ dar Mowqufat [A Jurisprudential-Legal Examination of Pastures and Forests Located in Endowments]. Āmūzah-hā-ye Fiqh-e Madanī, 4(5), 55–75. [In Persian]
  3. Esfahani, Abolhasan. (2001). Wasīlat al-Najāh. Qom: Mu’assasah-ye Tanẓīm va Nashr-e Āsār-e Emām Khomeini (ra). [In Arabic]
  4. Emamverdi, Mohammad Hasan. (2017). Māhiyat-shenāsi-ye Ḥaqq bar Ḥarīm dar Niẓām-e Ḥoquqī-ye Īrān [The Nature of the Right to Curtilage in the Iranian Legal System]. Majallah-ye Ḥoquq-e Khuṣūṣī, 14(2), 347–366. [In Persian]
  5. Ansari, Morteza. (1994). Kitāb al-Khums. Qom: Majma‘ al-Fikr al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
  6. Angoorj, Behzad. (2015). Sīyāsat va Nazārat dar Manābe‘-e Ṭabīī [Policy and Supervision in Natural Resources]. Tehran: Ārū [In Persian]
  7. Basri Bahrani, Zayn al-Din. (1992). Kalimat al-Taqwá (Vol. 5). Qom: Ismā‘īlīyā [In Arabic]
  8. Bahjat, Mohammad Taqi. (2002). Wasīlat al-Najāh. Qom: Shafaq. [In Arabic]
  9. Tabrizi, Javad. (2005). Minhāj al-Ṣāliḥīn (Vol. 2). Qom: Majma‘ al-Imām al-Mahdī (‘aj). [In Arabic]
  10. Khamenei, Seyed Ali. (2015). Esteftāāt-e Vaqf [Inquiries on Endowment]. Qom: Sāzmān-e Chāp va Enteshārāt-e Awqā [In Persian]
  11. Khalil Moghaddam, Kamal al-Din. (2022). Tashkhis-e Arāżi-ye Mellī az Mostathnayāt va Nahveh-ye E‘terāż-e Ashkhāṣ [Distinguishing National Lands from Exceptions and the Method of Objection by Individuals]. Muṭālaāt-e Ḥoquq, 29, 165–198. [In Persian]
  12. Khomeini, Ruhollah. (2000). Taḥrīr al-Wasīlah (Vols. 1–2). Qom: Mu’assasah-ye Maṭbū‘āt Dār al-‘ [In Arabic]
  13. Khoei, Abolqasem. (1989). Minhāj al-Ṣāliḥīn (Vol. 2). Qom: Madīnat al-‘ [In Arabic]
  14. Rahimi, ‘Abbās, & ‘Alawi Qazvini, Seyed ‘Ali. (2023). Shenāsāyi-ye Modda‘ī va Mawżū‘-e Dalīl dar Da‘vī-ye E‘terāż be Tashkhis-e Mellī Būdan-e Zamīn [Identifying the Claimant and the Subject of Proof in a Lawsuit Objecting to the Determination of Land as National]. Taḥqīqāt-e Ḥoquqī, 26(101), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.48308/jlr.2021.224265.2025 [In Persian]
  15. Shahid al-Thani. (1992). Masālik al-Afhām ilá Tanqīḥ Sharā’i‘ al-Islām (Vols. 1, 12, 13). Qom: Mu’assasat al-Ma‘ārif al-Islāmī [In Arabic]
  16. Shahid al-Thani. (1989). Al-Rawḍah al-Bahīyah fī Sharḥ al-Lum‘ah al-Dimashqīyah (Vol. 2). Qom: Maktabat al-I‘lām al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
  17. Shaykh Tusi. (2008). Al-Mabsūṭ fī Fiqh al-Imāmīyah (Vol. 3). Tehran: Al-Maktabah al-Murtaḍawīyah li-Iḥyā’ al-Āthār al-Ja‘farī [In Arabic]
  18. Safi Golpayegani, Lotfollah. (1995). Hidāyat al-‘Ibād (Vol. 2). Qom: Dār al-Qur’ān al-Karī [In Arabic]
  19. Tabatabai Ha’eri, ‘Ali. (1997). Riyāḍ al-Masā’il (Vol. 14). Qom: Mu’assasah Āl al-Bayt (‘alayhim al-salām). [In Arabic]
  20. Tabatabai Yazdi, Mohammad Kazem. (1994). Su’āl va Javāb [Question and Answer]. Tehran: Markaz-e Nashr al-‘Ulūm al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
  21. Fazel Lankarani, Mohammad. (2002). Tafṣīl al-Sharī‘ah – Al-Khums wa al-Anfāl. Qom: Markaz-e Feqhi-ye A’immah Aṭhār (‘alayhim al-salām). [In Arabic]
  22. Fadaei Moghaddam, ‘Abbās; Niknejad, Javād; & ‘Alamzadeh, Mohammad. (2021). Barrasi-ye Feqhi va Hoquqi-ye Asar-e Eḥyā dar Arāżi-ye Mellī [Jurisprudential and Legal Examination of the Effect of Reclamation on National Lands]. Muṭālaāt-e Feqhi va Falsafī, 12(48), 1–17. [In Persian]
  23. Farahani Fard, Sa‘id. (2016). Fiqh-e Manābe‘-e Ṭabīī [Jurisprudence of Natural Resources] (2nd ed.). Qom: Markaz-e Bayn al-Milalī-ye Tarjomeh va Nashr-e al-Muṣṭafā. [In Persian]
  24. Fayyaz Kabuli, Mohammad Esḥā (1980). Al-Arāḍī. Qom: Dār al-Kitāb. [In Arabic]
  25. Fayyazi, Seyed Mohammad-Reza. (2014). Barrasi-ye Feqhi-ye Mālekīyat-e Mardom bar Servat-hā-ye ‘Omūmī [Jurisprudential Study of Public Ownership of Public Wealth]. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  26. Qadi Ibn Barraj, ‘Abd al-‘Aziz. (1985). Al-Muhadhdhab (Vol. 2). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī. [In Arabic]
  27. Kashif al-Ghita’, Hadi. (2002). Hudá al-Muttaqīn ilá Sharī‘at Sayyid al-Mursalīn. Najaf: Mu’assasat Kāshif al-Ghiṭā’. [In Arabic]
  28. Lotfi, Ḥasan, & Gholami, Yā (2018). Taḥlīl-e Ḥoquqī-ye Arkān-e Da‘vī-ye E‘terāż be Tashkhis-e Arāżī-ye Mellī [Legal Analysis of the Elements of a Lawsuit Objecting to the Determination of National Lands]. Majallah-ye Ḥoquqī-ye Dādgostarī, 82(101), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2018.31412 [In Persian]
  29. Makarem Shirazi, Nasser. (1995). Anwār al-Fiqāha – Kitāb al-Khums wa al-Anfāl. Qom: Madrasah-ye Emām ‘Alī Ibn Abī Ṭālib (‘alayhi al-salām). [In Arabic]
  30. Muhaqqiq al-Karki. (1993). Jāmi‘ al-Maqāṣid fī Sharḥ al-Qawā‘id (Vol. 3). Qom: Mu’assasah Āl al-Bayt (‘alayhim al-salām). [In Arabic]
  31. Muhaqqiq Sabzevari. (2002). Kifāyat al-Aḥkām (Vols. 1–2). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī. [In Arabic]
  32. Muqaddas Ardabili, Ahmad. (n.d.). Majma‘al-Fā’idah wa al-Burhān fī Sharḥ Irshād al-Adhhān (Vol. 4). Qom: Mu’assasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. [In Arabic]
  33. Muzafar, Mahmud. (2013). Iḥyā’ al-Arāḍī al-Mawāt. Cairo: Al-Maṭba‘ah al-‘Ālamī [In Arabic]
  34. Mousavi Golpayegani, Mohammad Reza. (1992). Hidāyat al-‘Ibād (Vol. 2). Qom: Dār al-Qur’ān al-Karī [In Arabic]
  35. Najafi, Mohammad Hasan. (n.d.). Najāt al-‘Ibād. Tehran: Dār al-Ṭabā‘ [In Arabic]
  36. Najafi, Mohammad Hasan. (1984). Jawāhir al-Kalām fī Sharḥ Sharā’i‘ al-Islām (Vols. 16, 38). Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī. [In Arabic]