Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Foundations of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Law, Faculty of Jurisprudence and Law, International University of Islamic Denominations, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Considering the requirements of modern life and the domestic keeping of cats, an issue that necessitates particular examination is the owner's liability for damages caused by the animal. Therefore, the present study, using a descriptive-analytical method and comparing the opinions of Imamiyyah and Sunni jurists, is an attempt to evaluate the extent of the owner's liability for damages caused by the act of a domestic cat. The research findings indicate a jurisprudential disagreement on this issue. Although the majority of jurists hold the opinion of non-liability of the owner for damages caused by the animal's behavior, this view faces serious criticism. Upon close examination of the evidences for the various viewpoints on this matter, what is concluded is the strict liability of the owner for damages arising from the animal's behavior, as the preferred view in this issue. On the other hand, the legislator's approach in this regard is also varied. In the Civil Code, the view of fault-based liability is confirmed, while in the Penal Code, the view of liability conditioned upon the animal's harmful nature is adopted. This situation, in turn, necessitates a revision of the law and the establishment of a uniform procedure on this issue.
The findings of the research indicate a jurisprudential disagreement on this issue. Although the majority of jurists hold that the owner is not liable for damages caused by the animal’s behavior, this view faces serious criticism. A thorough analysis of the various arguments suggests that strict liability of the owner for the damages caused by the animal’s behavior is the preferred opinion in this matter.

On the other hand, the legislator's approach differs in this regard: the Civil Code adopts a fault-based liability model, while the Penal Code considers liability conditional on the animal’s aggressive nature. This divergence highlights the need for legal reform and harmonization of legal practice concerning this issue.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Amili, Zayn al-Din bin Ali (Shahid al-Thani). (1992). Masālik al-Afhām ilá Tanqīḥ Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām (1st ed.). Qom: Mu'assasat al-Ma'arif al-Islamiyyah. [In Arabic]
  2. Ansari, Ahmad bin Mohammad (Ibn Rif'ah). (2009). Kifāyat al-Nabīh fī Shar al-Tanbīh (1st ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah. [In Arabic]
  3. Ardabili, Ahmad bin Mohammad. (1982). Majmaʿ al-Fāʾidah wa al-Burhān fī Shar Irshād al-Adhhān (1st ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī affiliated with Jami'ah al-Mudarrisin Ḥawzah 'Ilmiyyah Qom. [In Arabic]
  4. Bahrani, Yusuf bin Ahmad. (1984). Al-adāʾiq al-Nāḍirah fī Akām al-ʿItrah al-Ṭāhirah (1st ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī affiliated with Jami'ah al-Mudarrisin Ḥawzah 'Ilmiyyah Qom. [In Arabic]
  5. Baydawi, Abdullah bin Umar. (2008). Al-Ghāyah al-Quwá fī Dirāyat al-Fatwá (1st ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Basha'ir al-Islamiyyah. [In Arabic]
  6. Damiri, Mohammad bin Musa. (2003). ayāt al-ayawān al-Kubrá (2nd ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah. [In Arabic]
  7. Fadel Hindi, Mohammad bin Hasan. (1995). Kashf al-Lithām wa al-Ibhām ʿan Qawāʿid al-Akām (1st ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī affiliated with Jami'ah al-Mudarrisin Ḥawzah 'Ilmiyyah Qom. [In Arabic]
  8. Fartusi Huwayzi, Hossein. (1995). Al-Tawḍīḥ al-Nāfiʿ fī Shar Taraddudāt Ṣāḥib al-Sharāʾiʿ (2nd ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī affiliated with Jami'ah al-Mudarrisin Ḥawzah 'Ilmiyyah Qom. [In Arabic]
  9. Ghazali, Abu Hamid Mohammad bin Mohammad. (1996). Al-Wasīṭ fī al-Madhhab (1st ed.). Cairo: Dar al-Salam. [In Arabic]
  10. Hafizi Qahistani, Mohammad Sadegh, Nikvand, Shokrollah, & Mohammadi, Abdolali. (2024). Civil liability of the possessor of conventional and unconventional animals in Iranian law and Islamic jurisprudence. Falnāmah-ye Pajūhishhā-ye Fiqh va uqūq-e Eslāmī, No. 75, pp. 105–124. [In Persian]
  11. Hashemi Shahroudi, Seyed Mahmoud. (1996). Muʿjam Fiqh al-Jawāhir. Beirut: Al-Ghadir lil-Tiba'ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'. [In Arabic]
  12. Hilli, Fakhr al-Muhaqqiqin, Mohammad bin Hasan. (1967). Iḍāḥ al-Fawāʾid fī Shar Mushkilāt al-Qawāʿid (1st ed.). Qom: Esma'ilian. [In Arabic]
  13. Hilli, Ibn Idris, Mohammad bin Mansur. (1989). Al-Sarāʾir al-Ḥāwī li-Tarīr al-Fatāwā (2nd ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī affiliated with Jami'ah al-Mudarrisin Ḥawzah 'Ilmiyyah Qom. [In Arabic]
  14. Hilli, Muhaqqiq, Ja'far bin Hasan. (1987). Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām fī Masāʾil al-alāl wa al-arām (2nd ed.). Qom: Esma'ilian. [In Arabic]
  15. Hilli, Allamah, Hasan bin Yusuf. (n.d.). Tarīr al-Akām al-Sharʿīyah ʿalá Madhhab al-Imāmīyah (1st ed.). Qom: Mu'assasat Āl al-Bayt ('alayhim al-salām). [In Arabic]
  16. Hilli, Allamah, Hasan bin Yusuf. (1992). Qawāʿid al-Akām fī Maʿrifat al-alāl wa al-arām (1st ed.). Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī affiliated with Jami'ah al-Mudarrisin Ḥawzah 'Ilmiyyah Qom. [In Arabic]
  17. Hilli, Allamah, Hasan bin Yusuf. (1993). Tadhkirat al-Fuqahāʾ. Qom: Mu'assasat Āl al-Bayt li-Iḥyāʾ al-Turā [In Arabic]
  18. Hosseini Ameli, Seyed Javad bin Mohammad. (n.d.). Miftāḥ al-Karāmah fī Shar Qawāʿid al-ʿAllāmah. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi. [In Arabic]
  19. Ibn Najim al-Misri, Zayn al-Din bin Ibrahim. (n.d.). Al-Bar al-Rāʾiq Shar Kanz al-Daqāʾiq. Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-Islami. [In Arabic]
  20. Ibn Qudamah, Muwaffaq al-Din Abdullah bin Ahmad. (1968). Al-Mughnī. Cairo: Maktabat al-Qahirah. [In Arabic]
  21. Isfahani, Seyyed Abolhassan. (n.d.). Wasīlat al-Najāt. Qom: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Arabic]
  22. Khoei, Seyyed Abolqasem. (1989). Takmilat al-Minhāj. Qom: Nashr Madinat al-'Ilm. [In Arabic]
  23. Mohaghegh Damad, Seyyed Mostafa. (1986). Qawāʿid-e Feqh [Rules of Jurisprudence] (12th ed.). Tehran: Markaz-e Nashr-e 'Ulum-e Eslami. [In Persian]
  24. Mufid, Mohammad bin Mohammad bin Nu'man (Shaykh al-Mufid). (1992). Al-Muqniʿah. Qom: Al-Mu'tamar al-'Alami li-Alfiyyat al-Shaykh al-Mufid. [In Arabic]
  25. Najafi (Kashif al-Ghita'), Mohammad Hossein bin Ali. (1940). Tarīr al-Majallah (1st ed.). Iraq: Al-Maktabah al-Murtaḍ [In Arabic]
  26. Najafi, Mohammad Hassan (Sahib al-Jawahir). (1984). Jawāhir al-Kalām fī Shar Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām. Beirut: Dar Ihya' al-Turath al-'Arabi. [In Arabic]
  27. Najafi, Mohammad Hassan bin Ja'far. (2001). Anwār al-Fiqāhah Kitāb al-Wadīʿah (1st ed.). Iraq: Mu'assasat Kashif al-Ghita'. [In Arabic]
  28. Nawawi, Yahya bin Sharaf. (1996). Fatāwá al-Imām al-Nawawī al-Musammá. Beirut: Dar al-Basha'ir al-Islamiyyah lil-Tiba'ah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi'. [In Arabic]
  29. Qaderi, Abdolhadi. (2017). A comparative study of animal owner's civil liability in the legal systems of Iran and Afghanistan. uqūq-e Puyā, 5(5), 51–80. [In Persian]
  30. Sabzevari, Seyed Abd al-A'la. (1992). Muhadhdhab al-Akām (4th ed.). Qom: Mu'assasat al-Manar – Daftar-e Ḥaḍrat-e Āyatollā [In Arabic]
  31. Samiri, Mofleh bin Hasan. (1999). Ghāyat al-Marām fī Shar Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām (1st ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Hadi. [In Arabic]
  32. Tabrizi, Javad bin Ali. (2007). Tanqīḥ Mabānī al-Akām Kitāb al-Dīyāt (1st ed.). Qom: Dar al-Siddiqah al-Shahidah ('alayhā al-salām). [In Arabic]
  33. Tusi, Mohammad bin Hasan (Shaykh al-Tusi). (1967). Al-Mabsūṭ fī Fiqh al-Imāmīyah (3rd ed.). Tehran: Al-Maktabah al-Murtaḍawiyyah li-Iḥyāʾ al-Āthār al-Ja'fariyyah. [In Arabic]
  34. Yazdanian, Alireza, & Niazi, Abbas. (2017). A comparative study of civil liability arising from animals in Islamic and Western law. Pajūhish-e Tabīqī-ye uqūq-e Eslām va Gharb, 4(4), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2018.2250.1232 [In Persian]
  35. Iran Open Data. (n.d.). Pets in Iran. Retrieved from https://iranopendata.org/fa/article/171-pets-in-iran/ [In Persian]