Document Type : Research Article
Author
Corresponding Author, Level Four Seminary Student, Khorasan Islamic Seminary, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Abstract
Takfir, as one of the complex issues of Islamic jurisprudence, has become a tool for division and violence in contemporary times due to the misuse of rational reasons. This study, using a descriptive-analytical method and library resources, examines the role of rational reasons in deducing takfiri rulings, the reasons for their misuse, and provides corrective solutions. The main research questions include how rational reasons have an incorrect effect on issuing irrational rulings, the factors that exacerbate this phenomenon, and solutions to reduce it within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence. The aim of this study is to identify the weak points of argumentation in takfir jurisprudence and provide practical solutions to correct this trend and strengthen jurisprudential and social cohesion. The findings show that incorrect interpretation of religious texts, lack of coherent methodology, and intellectual biases, especially in the views of Ibn Taymiyyah, have led to rulings lacking logical support and intensification of religious tensions. To address these challenges, the study proposes such suggestions as developing an objective methodology, strengthening interdisciplinary education, and developing digital surveillance. The innovation of this study lies in its multidimensional analysis of the causes of abuse and offering practical solutions to promote jurisprudential coherence and reduce division in the Islamic world.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)