Document Type : scientific
Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Theology, Faculty of Humanities, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Foundations of Islamic Law, Yasuj University, Yasuj, Iran
3 PhD in Jurisprudence and Foundations of Islamic Law, Department of Theology, Faculty of Humanities, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
Abstract
One of the most important matters of propaganda is the correct propagation of religious rulings. However, sometimes this category faces challenges, the most important of which is the mistakes of preachers in expressing rulings. Logically, if the preacher makes a mistake in expressing rulings, there should be a basis for his responsibility in terms of compensation, which is observed by searching in jurisprudential views and current laws in judicial courts, and it is obvious that the responsibility of the preacher should be clarified in accordance with the principles and principles governing jurisprudential and legal systems. The present study, using a descriptive analytical method, seeks to find an answer to the question of how a religious preacher is civilly liable in the event of a mistake in expressing religious rulings, and how a lawsuit can be filed against the preacher if the mistake is proven? In this study, after expressing the views and opinions of jurists, it was determined that material and moral damage caused by the expression of religious rulings by preachers can be considered compensable and justified by relying on the jurisprudential rules of non-harm and attribution, as well as the theory of absolute liability. Therefore, it is appropriate for the legislator to enact a specific and appropriate article to this issue.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)